Legislature(2013 - 2014)BARNES 124
02/05/2013 11:15 AM House ECON. DEV., TRADE & TOURISM
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Overviews (s): Presentations of the Alaska Regional Development Organizations | |
| Overview(s): Presentation by the Alaska Minerals Commission | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, TRADE AND
TOURISM
February 5, 2013
11:20 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Shelley Hughes, Chair
Representative Lynn Gattis
Representative Bob Herron
Representative Pete Higgins
Representative Harriet Drummond
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative Craig Johnson
Representative Kurt Olson
Representative Lance Pruitt
Representative Geran Tarr
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
OVERVIEWS(S): PRESENTATIONS OF THE ALASKA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
ORGANIZATIONS
- HEARD
OVERVIEW(S): PRESENTATION BY THE ALASKA MINERALS COMMISSION
- HEARD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
No previous action to record
WITNESS REGISTER
NICOLE GREWE, Program Coordinator
Alaska Regional Development Organization (ARDOR) Program
Juneau Office
Development Section
Division of Economic Development (DED)
Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development (DCCED)
Juneau, Alaska.
POSITION STATEMENT: Gave a presentation on the Alaska Regional
Development Organization Program including portions of the
Fiscal Year 2012 Annual Report.
LORENE PALMER, Division Director
Division of Economic Development (DED)
Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development (DCCED)
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered a question during the presentation
of the ARDOR Program.
SHELLY WRIGHT, Executive Director
Southeast Conference (SEC)
Juneau, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions and participated in the
presentation of the ARDOR Program.
ANDY VARNER, Executive Director
Southwest Alaska Municipal Conference (SWAMC)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered questions and participated in the
presentation of the ARDOR Program.
JASON HOKE, Executive Director
Copper Valley Development Association Inc.
Glennallen, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered a question during the presentation
of the ARDOR Program.
BILL JEFFRESS, Chair
Alaska Minerals Commission
Division of Economic Development (DED)
Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development (DCCED)
Fairbanks, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Provided a PowerPoint presentation
entitled, "Report of the 2013 Alaska Minerals Commission."
GREG BEISCHER, Member
Alaska Mineral Commission
Division of Economic Development (DED)
Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development (DCCED)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Answered a question during the presentation
by the Alaska Minerals Commission.
ACTION NARRATIVE
11:20:44 AM
CHAIR SHELLEY HUGHES called the House Special Committee on
Economic Development, Trade and Tourism meeting to order at
11:20 a.m. Representatives Higgins, Gattis, Drummond, and
Hughes were present at the call to order. Representative Herron
arrived as the meeting was in progress.
^OVERVIEWS (S): PRESENTATIONS OF THE ALASKA REGIONAL
DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS
OVERVIEWS (S): PRESENTATIONS OF THE ALASKA REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
ORGANIZATIONS
11:21:39 AM
CHAIR HUGHES announced that the first order of business would be
a presentation on the Alaska Regional Development Organization
(ARDOR) program by the Division of Economic Development (DED),
Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development
(DCCED).
There followed introductions of ARDOR representatives seated in
the gallery.
11:25:29 AM
NICOLE GREWE, Program Coordinator, Alaska Regional Development
Organization (ARDOR) program, Juneau Office, Development
Section, DED, DCCED, informed the committee the ARDOR annual
report for Fiscal Year 2012 (FY 12) and an overview of the
program are provided in the committee packet. She noted the
ARDOR Program is a familiar term in Alaska that is used to
identify the state program established in statute called the
Alaska Regional Economic Assistance Program. Former Senator
Arliss Sturgulewski was primarily responsible for the bill that
created the program in 1988, and this is the silver jubilee year
for the program. The statute authorizing the program directs
DCCED to encourage the formation of regional development
organizations to implement economic development strategies and
to take responsibility for the economic development planning for
a region. The department is also directed to assist in the
formation of the geographic regions - using guidelines
established in regulations - to gather information about local
economic issues, to assist ARDOR(s) in carrying out their
responsibilities, to provide technical assistance, and to
distribute annual grants. The state has 12 ARDOR(s) and as long
as each meets criteria they are eligible for a non-competitive
grant from the state. The ARDOR(s) also work closely with the
state on economic development initiatives. Ms. Grewe said this
is a small program and a small part of her job. The division of
economic development is a "pass-through" on the grant and
provides technical assistance.
11:30:12 AM
CHAIR HUGHES asked whether federal money was used to establish
the program in 1988 and if federal money continues to support
the program.
MS. GREWE was unsure about federal funding that was available at
that time. Historically, the legislature's motivation for the
program was to encourage regional entities to form and conduct
economic development planning at the regional level because
local leaders are best suited to organize and carry out economic
development planning. Revenue streams for ARDOR Programs are
primarily comprised of state and federal revenue, along with
private sector funds and in-kind contributions: in fact, the
present level of federal funding is indicated on the revenue
portfolio for each ARDOR provided in the annual report. Ms.
Grewe advised state funding for the program is small and
flexible to encourage each ARDOR to plan in a way that is
locally and culturally appropriate for each region. She opined
federal funds have more limitations.
CHAIR HUGHES asked for the percentage of state support.
MS. GREWE stated each of the 12 organizations receives about
$62,000 per year from the state. The revenue portfolio of the
12 combined was $5.5 million in FY 12.
11:33:31 AM
CHAIR HUGHES said $62,000 x 12 is about $750,000, and clarified
she inquired as to the percentage of DED's budget that goes to
ARDOR(s).
11:33:48 AM
LORENE PALMER, Division Director, DED, DCCED, said the DED total
budget is about $28 million thus $750,000 is a very small part.
CHAIR HUGHES said that was her point. She expressed her
interest in the deliverables and criteria required to receive
state and federal money.
MS. GREWE referred to page 5 of the annual report, which
included a map of the general geographic boundaries of each
ARDOR, and pointed out that the Arctic Slope, large portions of
the Interior, and a portion of Western Alaska are not
represented by an ARDOR, although the statute allows for grants
to 15 organizations. Regarding funding, a pie chart on page 4
of the FY 12 annual report indicated that total funding is about
$5.5 million of which state revenue is about 19 percent,
including additional grant money. Therefore, state funding of
the ARDOR Program is less than one-quarter of the total revenue
portfolio.
CHAIR HUGHES asked for examples of the additional state grants.
MS. GREWE responded that Southeast Conference has received a
grant for timber development work. The additional state grants
are on a project-by-project basis to individual ARDOR(s). Over
the past two years ARDOR(s) have received about $62,000 each
from the state and, although there is room for growth, if
additional organizations are added, all will share in the same
amount of revenue. Ms. Grewe then explained that state statute,
the Alaska Administrative Code, and the grant agreement work
together to determine the deliverables from each ARDOR Program
to the state. The deliverables are: to create a regional
economic development plan that is updated every two years; to
implement activities noted in the plan; and to convene a board
of directors to provide local or regional leadership.
11:39:15 AM
CHAIR HUGHES asked whether the plans are online and available to
the public.
MS. GREWE said yes, and added that all of the plans are
available on individual ARDOR web sites and on the state ARDOR
Program web site.
CHAIR HUGHES noted one ARDOR posted its 2006 report.
MS. GREWE advised the organizations are required to submit
updated plans to DCCED every two years; in fact, all have
current plans today. She concluded her presentation.
CHAIR HUGHES observed there are many differences between
ARDOR(s) regarding the composition of board members and in
funding. Some have more participation by the private sector,
and some are more active and successful than others. She asked
if the division considers replacing the executive director when
an ARDOR is not successful.
11:42:39 AM
MS. GREWE agreed each of the 12 ARDOR(s) is different, some are
rural and some are urban. By design, each can be different
because the purpose is for regions to gather together and work
collectively to best reflect local flavor, economy, and culture.
In urban Alaska, for example, the Anchorage Economic Development
Corporation and the Kenai Peninsula Economic Development
District are very active in traditional ways, such as recruiting
businesses, site-selection work, and loan funds. In many areas
the organizations and the communities look different. As the
program manager, she looks at all 12 organizations to ensure
that regional leaders are gathering to discuss economic issues
and develop priorities. Each plan must contain analyses of
social and economic conditions, be applicable to needs, and
include reasonable strategies. Also considered is whether
recent activities have been carried out to increase economic
opportunities. Ms. Grewe noted that SEC and the Southwest
Alaska Municipal Conference (SWAMC) are two of the most
successful ARDOR(s) in that they have active boards, execute
their plans through committees, and leverage the state's funds.
An unsuccessful ARDOR board does not meet, and its plan is
outdated and without change.
11:46:22 AM
REPRESENTATIVE HIGGINS asked if the chief executive officers are
paid.
MS. GREWE said all board members are volunteers.
REPRESENTATIVE GATTIS advised that CEOs are paid. She disclosed
she was a board member of the Matanuska-Susitna Resource
Conservation and Development Council, but is no longer.
CHAIR HUGHES asked whether the membership of each board is
directed by regulation or statute.
MS. GREWE advised that statute says the board needs to represent
the economic and social diversity of the region and have a
private sector presence.
CHAIR HUGHES restated her question as to what action the
division may take against a board that does not meet.
MS. GREWE answered that if an ARDOR is reported to be inactive
she and the director investigate and offer support; however,
program funds are not distributed to ARDOR(s) that do not meet
grant agreement requirements. In further response to Chair
Hughes, she said over the years, some organizations have not
received funding or have received reduced awards. In further
response, she said all inquiries regarding the executive
director are referred to the board. The program manager does
not have the ability to remove the executive director.
11:50:53 AM
CHAIR HUGHES asked if there is any correlation between the
amount of funding an ARDOR receives from the private sector and
its success.
MS. GREWE opined a diversified revenue portfolio is symbolic of
an organization that is sustainable, healthy, and robust. On
the other hand, some areas do not have a significant amount of
private sector revenue or a lot of local economic activity, so
comparing Anchorage or Juneau to Bethel is not always
appropriate. In further response to Chair Hughes, she said
mini-grants and other funds are available to ARDOR(s) on a
competitive basis, but the ARDOR Program grant is divided
equally between all of the organizations, unless funds are being
withheld.
11:53:00 AM
SHELLY WRIGHT, Executive Director, Southeast Conference (SEC),
in response to Chair Hughes, said she did not recall any
discussion about the ARDOR Program grants being distributed on a
competitive basis among the ARDOR(s). Ms. Wright turned
attention to Southeast Conference (SEC), which was formed in
1958 by a group of community leaders that were advocating for
the Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS). Once AMHS was
established and successful, SEC grew into an organization that
became the federally-designated Economic Development District
and the ARDOR for the region. In answer to an earlier question,
she said ARDOR(s) that are also federally-designated economic
development districts have requirements for a percentage of
private and public board members, which explains some of the
differences between boards. In fact, SEC has requirements for
board members in workforce development, private industry, and
public representation. As SEC is an old organization, it is
well-known in its region as the "go-to" organization in
Southeast Alaska when communities need advocacy or assistance
for their projects. For its funding, SEC receives federal
funding through the economic development district
administration, which is matched by the ARDOR state grant.
Furthermore, SEC is a membership organization and its members
support many of its special projects. Currently, SEC has a
state grant which funds an energy coordinator to facilitate the
development of regional energy projects.
11:57:20 AM
CHAIR HUGHES asked for more information about energy projects.
MS. WRIGHT said SEC provides technical assistance and
facilitates the process of energy development. The energy
coordinator facilitates meetings of the regional utilities and
is very involved in projects such as the Kake-Petersburg
Intertie. In addition, SEC has state money to complete an
alternative wildlife strategy to present to the U.S. Forest
Service for the Tongass Land Management Plan (TLMP) review, and
will be working with DCCED on a messaging program for the timber
industry. In response to Chair Hughes, she confirmed that SEC
received $600,000 for those two programs.
MS. WRIGHT pointed out that currently the ARDOR Program is not
fully funded at its statutory limit of up to $100,000 per
organization, and has not been since its inception. In response
to Chair Hughes, she indicated by nodding her head that the
funding was established in 1988.
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON asked how ARDOR(s), individually and as a
group, have lobbied the governor for an increase.
12:00:15 PM
ANDY VARNER, Executive Director, Southwest Alaska Municipal
Conference (SWAMC), said Copper Valley Development Association
met with the governor over the summer and presented letters of
support from other ARDOR(s). Other routes of communication have
been through the commissioner of DCCED.
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON asked for the governor's response.
12:01:47 PM
JASON HOKE, Executive Director, Copper Valley Development
Association Inc., relayed he met with the governor on 9/6/12 to
discuss issues in his region. He said the governor is fully
supportive of the ARDOR Program and suggested ARDOR
representatives contact their legislators about an increase in
funding. Mr. Hoke said it has been eight years since the last
increase and $62,000 does not go far in rural Alaska. He said
the ARDOR(s) have collectively garnered support from members and
stakeholders for this issue.
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON surmised the following: the governor
would support an increase in budget authorized by the
legislature; and it is easier for the legislature to defend a
budget number that is promoted by the governor.
CHAIR HUGHES asked SEC to elaborate on its task for the timber
industry.
MS. WRIGHT stated that TLMP is under review, and the wildlife
strategy is not timber-friendly, but is one that eliminates most
of the economic timber. Through a contractor, SEC is developing
an alternative, more timber-friendly wildlife strategy, and a
threshold analysis to determine the supply and demand of an
economic timber industry. The messaging campaign will convince
Southeast Alaska residents and others that the timber in Alaska
is renewable, is better, and the timber industry will not
destroy the forest.
CHAIR HUGHES heard that the timber industry is burdened because
of a lack of a social license.
12:05:09 PM
MR. VARNER announced SWAMC is also 25 years old this year. The
Southwest ARDOR region comprises Kodiak, Bristol Bay, and the
Aleutian and Pribilof Islands, and covers an area the size of
Oregon. His organization has two staff members and the three
areas originally bonded to address common fisheries' issues.
Southwest Alaska Municipal Conference has signed two contracts
with the Alaska Energy Authority (AEA) to complete energy plans
for the Bristol Bay region and the Aleutians region, and may
commit to energy planning for Kodiak also. Energy development
is a huge issue for rural Alaska and SWAMC seeks to make these
plans a reality by working with communities, industry, and
private entities. Four other ARDOR(s) are involved with
regional energy plans, which is a big responsibility.
CHAIR HUGHES noted four ARDOR(s) are working on energy plans and
asked whether the plans will be integrated on a statewide basis.
MR. VARNER opined at the end of the process it will make sense
to find the overlaps and opportunities, and to work for a
statewide energy plan in light of the statewide energy policy.
The contracts that SWAMC is working on will have a methodology
that gives technical and economically feasible analysis for the
various projects.
CHAIR HUGHES asked if there is a vehicle so that an ARDOR or
ARDORs working together can provide DCCED with information on
topics such as infrastructure.
12:09:32 PM
MR. VARNER said ARDOR regions meet twice a year to discuss
issues across regional borders. Topics such as the railroad,
fisheries, and agriculture and food, are discussed in working
groups, and ARDOR(s) are trying to reach across regions and
borders, looking for business opportunities. He observed this
is a recent focus.
12:11:24 PM
CHAIR HUGHES surmised integration occurs when a need arises, but
plans are not formally integrated.
MR. VARNER said correct. In fact, there is an effort by the
Alaska Partnership for Economic Development to develop a
statewide economic development plan. In response to Chair
Hughes, he agreed that an integrated statewide plan would make
tasks easier because his group has ideas on shipping and Arctic
support industries, as do other western coastal communities.
Organizations that have common interests would specialize.
CHAIR HUGHES noticed that some ARDOR(s) have more of a local
focus and others bring in outside "primary dollars." She asked
if this decision is left to the individual boards.
MR. VARNER opined ARDOR(s) must think small and big. Because
SWAMC represents a large region that is expensive to traverse,
it thinks big. Although SWAMC assists small businesses and
individuals, its board directs attention to transshipping
through the Aleutians, partnering opportunities between
community development quota (CDQ) areas that want to expand, and
regional energy plans.
MS. WRIGHT added that SEC is driven by its board and its 174
members and their municipalities, organizations, small
businesses, and individuals. The SEC board is influenced by
what its members want; in fact, the board encourages members to
"think local and plan regional." There are exceptions, but SEC
is concentrating on building infrastructure and lowering the
cost of energy in Southeast.
12:18:26 PM
^OVERVIEW(S): PRESENTATION by the ALASKA MINERALS COMMISSION
OVERVIEW(S): PRESENTATION by the ALASKA MINERALS COMMISSION
12:19:02 PM
CHAIR HUGHES announced that the final order of business would be
a presentation by the Alaska Minerals Commission.
12:19:17 PM
BILL JEFFRESS, Chair, Alaska Minerals Commission, informed the
committee the commission was created by the legislature and its
charter is to report to the legislature and the governor on ways
to mitigate potential impacts affecting mineral development in
Alaska; the following report fulfills that mandate. Members of
the commission are appointed by the governor, the president of
the Senate, and the speaker of the House. Currently members
represent exploration, hard-rock mining, coal mining, and all
facets of the industry. The commission also considers
information provided by resource agencies, the University of
Alaska (UA), and other organizations on issues related to
mineral development.
CHAIR HUGHES relayed there is pending legislation to extend the
commission's authorization, which is about to expire.
12:22:45 PM
MR. JEFFRESS said the commission is an all-volunteer board and
clerical work is well supported by the Department of Commerce,
Community & Economic Development (DCCED) staff. The mandate
tasks the commission to identify issues that affect potential
mineral development, and he extended accolades to the
administration and the legislature for acting on past
recommendations from the commission. This is critical to
sending a message to the industry that Alaska is open for
business. The first action item recommended by the commission
this year is to improve tax climate for mineral investment and
resource revenue sharing [slide 3].
12:24:50 PM
CHAIR HUGHES, referring to the first action item, asked whether
there is pending legislation on the tax climate.
MR. JEFFRESS said no, and clarified that the commission makes
recommendations.
REPRESENTATIVE GATTIS asked what recommendations are being made
regarding the tax climate issue.
MR. JEFFRESS said there is a mining license tax imposed on
producing mines, and other fees are paid by the industry. In a
manner similar to taxes on fishing, he suggested that a portion
of that tax could be returned to local communities that are
affected by exploration, mining, or development activities.
CHAIR HUGHES asked whether local communities approached the
commission.
MR. JEFFRESS explained this recommendation is a combination of
members' experience in the industry and impacts to communities;
for example, the City of Nome (Nome) has defined boundaries, but
impacts from a resurgence of offshore mining and prospecting
occur in Nome. In further response to Chair Hughes, he said the
amount of fees and taxes collected from mining would need to be
obtained from the Department of Revenue (DOR).
12:27:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GATTIS confirmed that the commission is
recommending resource revenue sharing, and the recommendation is
not for tax reform.
MR. JEFFRESS said no. Returning to the second action item of
transportation infrastructure, he said the commission supports
the governor's policy on strategic and critical metals; however,
energy corridors are needed to reach known deposits such as the
Donlin Creek project. Infrastructure is a hurdle to making a
mine economic [slide 4]. In response to Chair Hughes, he
expressed the commission's support for all transportation
options, including the rail extensions from North Pole to U.S.
Army Fort Greely, and to Port MacKenzie.
12:30:13 PM
MR. JEFFRESS directed attention to the third action item,
education. Alaska has the potential to become a leader in
producing mine engineers and professionals who support the
mining industry; in fact, UA has one of the few mining schools
in the country. The president of UA responded to the
commission's recommendations from last year and created the
Consolidated Alaska Minerals Initiative (CAMI) which will keep
the mineral development programs at the three campuses in
communication, and able to accept credit transfers between
campuses, although the effective date for this change is
unclear. Another factor of education is to educate young people
and adults as to the importance of resource development and
especially mineral development. The commission urges the
legislature to continue its current level of funding for Alaska
Resource Education (ARE) and its Google Earth minerals
curriculum. This is an interactive program to see where
minerals come from and all of the schools in Alaska could
benefit from its use. Mr. Jeffress said the commission supports
ARE's request for an additional $100,000 in funding [slide 5].
The fourth recommendation is for legislative funding to oppose
federal intervention on mining projects, in particular the
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) overreach into the
authority of the state and other federal agencies. He said this
interjection has complicated permitting by other federal
agencies and Alaska's ability to develop its resources. Another
issue is the [United Nations (UN) International Maritime
Organization (IMO)] designation of Emission Control Areas (ECA),
affecting Southeast and the coast up to the Kenai Peninsula
[slide 6].
12:35:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HIGGINS disclosed he is a miner. He brought up
the U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA), and said its overreach is on "small mom
and pop operations" because it considers all mines to be the
same; for example, a two-man operation must have an office.
Along with the seven major mines in Alaska there are hundreds of
small operations that need assistance in this regard.
MR. JEFFRESS agreed and noted there is also support for this
issue from members of the Senate.
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON disclosed he is a gold miner with eight
mining claims. He stated a member of the commission has been
appointed to the Alaska Arctic Policy Commission. He then urged
for a recommendation to the federal government that Alaska needs
to be a full partner in decisions about Alaska and Arctic
policy.
MR. JEFFRESS said the fifth recommendation is funding for the
Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Division of Geological &
Geophysical Surveys (DGGS). The state lacks a geological
materials center where industry can see core [samples] from
mining and petroleum for further study to identify new
discoveries. As this time, the DGGS materials center is housed
in shipping containers that are insufficient for viewing, even
though 400 to 500 visitors come every year. The commission
supports the administration in its efforts to obtain a facility
in Anchorage to house the materials center so the material is
available to potential investors [slide 7].
CHAIR HUGHES recalled her visit to the materials center - noting
the state of disrepair - and asked whether there are funds in
the governor's budget for a building.
12:39:51 PM
MR. JEFFRESS said yes. In addition, DGGS is tasked with
mapping; however, high prices in the minerals industry have led
to high salaries and a loss of DGGS employees to private
companies. The commission recommends that the DGGS salary
classification system be treated as is the Division of Oil & Gas
(DOG) in order to keep talented employees to prepare maps,
identify resources, and provide information to exploration
companies. In response to Chair Hughes, he was unsure if the
governor's budget addresses DGGS salaries.
12:41:06 PM
MR. JEFFRESS, in conclusion, displayed a map that located
existing properties in operation, advanced development projects,
and advanced exploration projects throughout the state. He
pointed out the distances between projects and that the lack of
infrastructure plays a critical role in exploration and
development, and the promotion of investment in the state [slide
8].
CHAIR HUGHES asked for the percentage of mining that has been
"tapped" in the state.
12:42:14 PM
GREG BEISCHER, member, Alaska Mineral Commission, said as an
exploration geologist he has studied mineral occurrence maps of
British Colombia, Canada (B.C.). In B.C., there is a higher
density of plotted mineral deposits per square mile, but the
reason is not geological - because Alaska has the same geology -
but because Alaska is less accessible and mineral discoveries
have yet to be made. In further response to Chair Hughes, he
estimated eight to ten times more mines will be discovered.
12:43:24 PM
CHAIR HUGHES said the committee wants to do what it can to
ensure that there are no barriers to the mining industry.
12:44:02 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Special Committee on Economic Development, Trade and Tourism
meeting was adjourned at 12:44 p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 Alaska Minerals Commission Report FINAL.pdf |
HEDT 2/5/2013 11:15:00 AM |
|
| AMC2013 Presentation 5Feb13.pdf |
HEDT 2/5/2013 11:15:00 AM |
|
| DED - ARDOR Program - EDT&T 020513.pdf |
HEDT 2/5/2013 11:15:00 AM |
ARDOR |
| FY12 ARDOR Report.pdf |
HEDT 2/5/2013 11:15:00 AM |
ARDOR |